NaBloPoMo - Two to Go
Posted by Aphra Behn on November 29, 2007
Lorem ipsum ex mea admodum epicurei reprimique. At causae partiendo complectitur eos, simul ancillae cum ex. Ut vim clita tempor ancillae, no veri dicta deleniti nec. Persius honestatis interpretaris duo et, ad meis dicta altera has. Sed id sumo summo eligendi, vim elitr postulant ei, rebum persequeris est ea.
Pri omnesque scripserit persequeris te. Quis omnium ocurreret pro et, ex brute periculis eos. Nec ad duis eruditi democritum, mea epicuri consequuntur ne, hinc eros facilisi et has. Mel graece offendit id. Pro suas reprimique id. Eos an feugiat periculis, doming appareat postulant ei cum, quo cu animal nominavi.
Vix at mutat prodesset inciderint, has eu vero referrentur. Nec an scaevola reprimique, ei harum placerat detraxit ius. Pri ex noluisse perfecto. Cu legere efficiantur nam, ad graeci verterem mei, eam eu legimus graecis. Ut soluta deseruisse mea, ne aliquyam ornatus vituperatoribus ius, ne usu ludus labitur. Nec in consul voluptua mediocritatem, eu alterum atomorum vel.


not 
November 29, 2007 at 9:43 am
Yes, exactly. Well said, Aphra.
November 29, 2007 at 11:41 am
I just found out why pig Latin fillers always start Lorem ipsum.
November 29, 2007 at 12:05 pm
I thought you’d gone all clever and was going to find my GCSE Latin dictionary. Then I realised this was the same stuff that design companies send me and expect me to replace with English.
Still would like to know what it means but really can’t be arsed to find out. Anybody?
November 29, 2007 at 8:04 pm
It doesn’t mean anything - it’s pretend Latin (see my link).
November 29, 2007 at 8:11 pm
Oh, thanks. I confess to being a trifle disappointed - I expected a great philosophical truth to be in there or something. Hey-ho.
But it does its job I suppose. I came across someone who used an alternative recently - completely randomly created ‘English’ words and non-words. Very distracting. It’s amazing how many were just a letter away from utter rudeness, or combined in such a way that made you (well, me) wonder what kind of tangled, messy coupling they were describing.
November 29, 2007 at 8:40 pm
Heh heh heh.
November 29, 2007 at 9:43 pm
*hangs head in shame*